Showing posts with label ash trees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ash trees. Show all posts

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Article: A New Exotic Pest

Hacket, Robert A.,  Eduard Jendek, Houping Liu, Kenneth R. Marchant, Toby R. Petrice, Therese M. Poland, and Hui Ye. 2002. "The emerald ash borer: a new exotic forest pest in North America." Newsletter. Michigan Entomology Society: (47) 3&4. September.


This newsletter brought some bad news to the United States. The authors, collaborators from America, Canada, Slovakia, and China, worked together to identify a new insect found in Michigan in June of 2002. When researchers observed some ash trees were declining, they noticed the "D"-shaped holes in the bark and the cambium-killing larvae tunnels. 


Quickly identifying the beetle was not possible. There are more than 2,000 species in the Agrilus family, so it wasn't until July 9th, when the specimens where shipped to Eduard Jendek, a specialist in Asian Agrilus, that the bug was positively identified at Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (2). Shortly after, the Michigan Department of Agriculture started enforcing quarantines in infested counties. Meanwhile, Canadian authorities had found a similar beetle, it wasn't until August 7th that it too was confirmed as the same insect (2). At this point, researchers estimated the insect had been established for five years (4)!!!


This article provided great insight on the process of determining a new species in an environment. When an animal breaks through to a new boundary or region, it can easily be identified. Not so with small insects who come from wide families and get carried on shipping containers. 


When the insect was identified, the researches took votes on what to call it. They wanted to make sure the media didn't name the insect (1). Oregon Department of Agriculture's Richard Wescott and Natalia Vandenburg of the USDA suggested the name Emerald Ash Borer (EAB). Votes were tallied and a new acronym was born (1). 


The taxonomy section mentioned that the beetle goes by other names as well.  


Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (1888; type China) has several synonyms, including A. marcopoli Obenberger (1930; type China), A. marcopoli ulmi Kurosawa (1956; type Japan), and A. feretrius Obenberger (1936; type Taiwan) (Jendek 1994).  EAB is referred to as A. marcopoli in much of the Chinese literature and as A. marcopoli ulmi in Japan.  Based on the morphology of the scutellum, deep pronotal medial sulcus, and robust body, A. planipennis appears most closely related to the Asian species A. auristermum Obenberger, A. cyaneoniger Saunders, and A. lubopetri Jendek (2).


I didn't know this was allowed in the world of entomology—it certainly makes things confusing. But I can understand why it would be very difficult to streamline names across cultures, especially when one culture has completely adapted a name. I wonder then, do other countries refer to EAB by these other names still? Or has the new concern in the West changed the way people refer to it? I looked at Eduard Jendek's website later and found nearly 100 varieties of insects named after him.


EAB, though new, is not alone as an foreign Agrilus. The authors list six other exotic members of the Agrilus family established in the United States (4).


The native habitat is described as Northeastern China, Far Eastern Russia, and Taiwan. The authors say only two Asian research articles were found on the bug, one from 1986, one from 1992 (2). Hacket, et al. provide a synopsis of these studies and describe other upcoming studies from Michigan (2). Significant early timetables provide a step-by-step retelling of the early infestation and where the beetles in the same family had been found at points of entry, although it was implied the ships were from China and Japan, the authors show it needed more study (4).


To conclude, the authors warn readers with a level-headed use of emotional language. Resources are said to be "at risk," because the wherever the insect moved, it "successfully attacked." The result could be "considerable economic and environmental damage." Therefore, "A vigorous research and management program along with harmonized quarantine actions are urgently needed to contain this new exotic tree pest" (5). 

Saturday, November 5, 2011

Article: Landowner Perceptions

Mackenzie, Bruce F., and Brendon M. H. Larson. 2010. "Participation Under Time Constraints: Landowner Perceptions of Rapid Response to the Emerald Ash Borer." Society & Natural Resources 23, no. 10: 1013-1022. EBSCO MegaFILE, EBSCOhost (accessed November 5, 2011).


This case study provides a look across the border, into Canada. The authors examine the trust in a community-agency relationship between an agency of the Canadian government (CFIA), and the community around a fresh infestations of EAB in Ontario, Canada. The agency provide a rapid response to the pest by cutting down all ash trees within a barrier zone 10km wide and 30km long (seen as the checkered pattern in Figure 1. below). Most of the removed trees resided on private property.
Image from "Particpation Under Time Constraints: Landowner Perceptions of Rapid Response to Emerald Ash Borer," published in Society & Natural Resources, page 1015.


In cases like these, three things prevent participation from communities: The speed at which the government needs to react to prevent the spread (the "rapid response"), the lack of knowledge about the particular bug, and the length of time it takes to plan and create community-oriented participation programming.


The authors write that the government should proceed with the participation of the public as much as possible. They state the following: "Generally speaking, citizens should be direct participants, as equals in face-to-face discussions with decision makers throughout the process and in advance of any actions" (1014). Some may disagree with this claim because they value the response of the agency over the participation of the group. They write the case study to "contribute insights that will reduce the social impact of future rapid response programs" (1014).


The study begins with a review of social articles on trust. This shows how a form of government might better gain the trust of the communities. They can do so by getting people 
to participate (1013). Then the background of EAB is given. 


The authors explain how many citizens thought the government acted too slowly. They formed a coalition and pleaded for the government to cut down trees immediately. But when the government started removing trees, private landowners got ticked (1016). Crews were held up, equipment was damaged, and there was a strong landowner vs. government struggle.


The study consists of interviews with people in the barrier zone. The authors took a snowball sampling of people they found interviewed in the newspapers. They conducted 17 face-to-face interviews lasting one hour each. The interviews were transcribed and recorded, then coded.


In this article the authors cite from government sources, such as the Canadian government website and the USDA; newspapers, such as the London Free Press and Guelph Mercury; science journals, such as Journal of Forestry and Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics. I'm glad they did, because I kept thinking I could never cite all technical writing journals for my research. But I kept wondering, would it make sense for me to cite all these different genres in my thesis?


The case study revealed many unhappy homeowners. Some cited a lack of institutional trust (1017), some cited doubts about the science behind the barrier zone (1017), and some citied concerns about the public consultation process (1018). To conclude, the authors provide some quick active response protocols for public engagement.


I'm very happy to have found this article. While it's short length prevents too much context for the problem, the idea of challenging the government's process agency-community communication was done in a scientific way, even though with the researchers providing results from qualitative research.


This is my breakthrough article. I can do something like this!

Graphic: Ash Tree Quantity in Great Lakes States


This graphic by Kevin Hall displays the quantity of ash by county across the northeastern and north central United States. With a quick glance, the readers establish a high concentration of ash in Minnesota, New York, and Maine. 

While the graphic makes it appear Minnesota has the highest concentration, this is only because of the larger counties (St. Louis County is one of the largest in the nation). Maine has the largest concentration of ash trees in the United States.

The small grey lines show the general quarantine of the Twin Cities, which is now a general infestestion. 

 Hall, Kevin G. Star Tribune. 2 June 2009